Experiment registry · Stack validation — whether the stack supports autonomous play · Experiment 001
Run 1 — baseline stack
Completeran 2026-07-10 → 2026-07-17; the full dataset is public.
Full dataset on Hugging Face ↗
Three fast-tier models — claude-haiku-4-5, gpt-4o-mini, gemini-2.5-flash-lite — each dropped into the live world with $10 of inference, seven days, and a fresh wallet, on the v0 baseline stack: the first entry in the stack stress-test series, and the frozen baseline every iteration after it is measured against.
| Status | complete — the full dataset is public |
| Arms | claude-haiku-4-5 (Anthropic) · gpt-4o-mini (OpenAI) · gemini-2.5-flash-lite (Google) |
| The box | $10 of inference per arm (invisible to the agent) · 7-day wall clock · "complete as many quests as possible" |
| Stack | kami-agent @ 3ebd5b8 (v0 baseline) · kami-harness v1.3.1 — the 84-tool v1.x surface |
| Window | launched 2026-07-10; walls closed 2026-07-17 |
| Dataset | experiment-001-budget-boxed · citable pinned revision v0-baseline |
Goal
The goal was to prove the v0 stack under real autonomous use in the live world before anything open-ended ran on it. Run 1 opened the stack-validation series and established the frozen baseline for every later stack iteration. The series protocol, architecture, and measurement are defined on the design page.
Outcome
The three arms diverged sharply. Haiku completed the entire onboarding chain
and five quests on day one, exhausting its budget in 17 hours. gpt-4o-mini ran
for the full week without ever calling register_account; all 24 of its game
transactions reverted, and it completed zero quests. Gemini spent six days
stuck before registration, then a single legible validation error unblocked it
and it completed three quests. Cost per quest was $2.15 for haiku, $3.00 for
gemini, and ∞ for gpt-4o-mini.
| haiku-4.5 | gpt-4o-mini | gemini-2.5-flash-lite | |
|---|---|---|---|
| stopped | budget, hour 17 | 7-day wall | 7-day wall |
| quests | 5 | 0 | 3 |
| Kamis bought | 2 (level 1) | 0 | 1 (level 31) |
| successful on-chain actions | 45 | 0 | 11 |
| chain revert rate | 0.58 | 0.97 | 0.94 |
Milestones
First success per onboarding/economy milestone, against cumulative inference — the frozen rows that stack iterations (Run 2 onward) are compared against. The full milestone table is on the dataset card.
Key learnings
- Error legibility, not model capability, was the sharpest differentiator — one human-readable validation error did in a single turn what four days of opaque chain reverts could not.
- A single missing step was the cleanest capability discriminator — two arms completed every onboarding step except registration, and neither ever identified it as the blocker.
- Cost structure dominated spend — the 84-tool surface re-billed uncached on every call, and un-broken poll loops made repetition detection a budget control, not just hygiene.
- Orientation speed and decision quality are different axes — haiku moved fast and bought level-1 Kamis; gemini moved slowly and bought a level-31 Kami near floor price.
Most of what this run taught us was about the stack, not the models — each learning became a pinned stack change that Run 2 then re-measured at fixed models and budget.
Full detail
The full run report — the narrative, the complete milestone table, the learnings in full, the stack changes this run produced, schemas, run manifests, provenance, and every caveat — lives on the dataset card.